LEAN, MEAN & “GREEN”: Takedown of America

Part Two – By Sharon Sebastian – Website: DarwinsRacists.com

A radical environmentalist of the 1700s wrote in the Temple of Nature that man should eye with tenderness all living forms, including…his brother-ants and sister-worms. That man was Erasmus Darwin, a virulent anti-Christian Pantheist who was grandfather to Charles Darwin. As revealed in the book, Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (DarwinsRacists.com) — influenced by his grandfather’s writings, Darwin conceived the theory of evolution. It is a “theory” that replaces God as Creator and worships the god of nature or natural selection. It is hardcore environmentalism and is being taught in schools across America today.

Indoctrination by environmentalists in America’s schools is girded by Darwin’s “theory” of nature, which continues today to lack empirical scientific data to support it as fact. Yet, as with global warming, advocates like to insist that the debate is over. Though man-made global warming is heavily tainted with fraud, the United Nations and radical environmentalists are now desperate to discredit the scandal that discredited their “scientific data” as a scam. But, the word is out making it a hard sale even to the most gullible. Nonetheless, hundreds of millions of dollars, donated to the U.N., are funneled into school systems to indoctrinate students in support of Climate Change. Persuading or frightening young minds is vital, because much is as stake.

The U.N.’s Green Charter, based on a radical environmental agenda reliant on “global panic,” seeks to transfer world power to a world body, such as the U.N. It sets out to “redistribute global wealth” from the wealthier nations, such as America, to less developed nations. It advocates creating “green jobs” through abandoning coal, oil and gas in favor of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. It seeks to elevate the rights and protections of animals, fish and insects in their natural habitat above that of humans. It seeks to nationalize lands and seize personal property, including farmlands.

The strategy to take down America, as we know it, is spelled out in the U.N.’s Green Charter. Crucial to the Green Charter’s goal to accommodate underdeveloped countries is to overhaul, to effect a “change,” to America’s system of government and economic prominence. In short, Americans’ hard work, innovation, creativity and initiative undermine countries that have not kept up. Those who support the U.N.’s Green Charter seek to dissolve individual rights through health care regulations, to control and allocate energy resources to individuals through government control via mechanisms like Cap-and-Trade, to control individual ownership and rights to property through processes like imminent domain, and take control of middle class lifestyles involving food intake, health decisions, size of families, use of appliances, use of air conditioning at home and at work, and restrict single family housing in favor of a stack-and-pack plan.

The Green Charter warns that America’s “refusal to act now on global warming would represent a crime against present and future generations.” In other words, America would be considered a criminal enterprise if it did not respond to the threat of man-made global warming. The ecological fly in that ointment, however, is the damning revelation of climate-gate’s bogus data. It should be noted that the U.N.’s Green Charter as drafted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 was a guideline for Al Gore’s documentary film, “An Inconvenient Truth.” The Rio Earth Summit demanded that industrialized nations must ante up 600 billion dollars to underdeveloped countries as penance for their sin against nature and the environment. If history is any indication, accountability for and application of the $600 billion may easily disappear through the sieve of the U.N.’s notoriously inbred corruption. World power is the bottom line, a Teutonic shift to take down America as a dominant economic leader to a nation answerable to the demands of concentrated global control in the hands of an elite few. That the U.N.’s Green Charter consists of an almost identical blueprint as Barack Obama’s Health Care and Cap-and-Trade plans is undeniable and highly problematical.

Consider that members of Congress may need to be bribed or promised sought-out committee appointments or comfortable ambassadorships to accomplish the deconstructing of America. The President has taken action that weakens both Congress and his Cabinet’s relevance vis-à-vis his power-laden Czars. That he already “ignores” the very Constitution he swore to uphold, seems to be lost on members of Congress as they jostle for bones being tossed by the White House. The success of the U.N.’s Green Charter (available online) is based on Climate Change, control of energy resources and control of health care. It diminishes America’s power and surrenders it to global interests.

Every one of us is an environmentalist who wants cleaner air and cleaner water for all people who share the globe. But, Americans recognize a scam, even one of global proportions, especially when they are the primary target. That our multi-national companies and leaders in the upper echelons of our government are positioning themselves to cash-in at the expense of American liberty and sovereignty is a crime against this great nation and the people who have worked and died to build and protect it. America did not elect a president to oversee its decline.

Sharon Sebastian DarwinsRacists.com is an author, writer and contributor for various forms of media including broadcast, print and online websites. Her second book, Darwin’s Racists – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, addresses the global “evolution vs. creation” debate highlighting both the impact of Social Darwinism on America’s culture today and its influence on current policy coming out of Washington.

Website: DarwinsRacists.com

Part One: LEAN, MEAN & “GREEN”: The Smoking Gun by Sharon Sebastian

Part Two: LEAN, MEAN & “GREEN”: Takedown of America by Sharon Sebastian

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post

Anti-Gun Government Tyranny in Canada

-By Warner Todd Huston

Unlike the U.S., Canada does not have the right of self-protection enshrined in its laws. Where we Americans have the coverage of the Second Amendment to protect our God-given right to self-protection, the Canadians have to rely on the occasional good nature of their overlords in government to determine how their right to own a firearm is treated. Sadly, their ownership of firearms is usually mistreated rather than upheld.

A writer for the Toronto Star wrote an article recently that showed the capriciousness of government thugs where it concerns privately owned firearms in Canada. Joe Fiorito had a retinue of Toronto’s finest stormtroopers come beating on his door one day this month to confiscate his old rifle because the columnist had the temerity of forgetting to re-up his registration of a disassembled, 30-year-old, small caliber bird gun.

Involved were multiple police cars, half a dozen officers, judge’s warrants. All sorts of iron, jack-booted automatons of the state came down on Mr. Fioritto. It was as if he were public enemy no. 1. All of this over a beat up old rifle that was disassembled, locked in a basement, and stored in a house in which no ammunition existed.

You might laugh at this absurd overreach. It might amuse you that all these thousands of Canadian dollars in state funded policing assets were wasted for this practically useless old rifle in the possession of an obviously unassuming and powerless citizen. You might utter a guffaw at the Canadian’s follies.

But be forewarned: Canada is but one step ahead the U.S.A. if the American left has by hook or crook gotten its way and outlawed our Constitutional rights.

Mr. Fiorito calls himself a “social democrat who wears his bleeding heart on his sleeve,” and one that agrees with the Toronto gun registry… or at least used to. He says he agrees that no one but cops should be allowed to have handguns or “military-style weapons.” But what threat, he wonders, did his little bird gun present to society?

I am and have been a supporter of the gun registry but now I’m not so sure, not when ownership of a two-bit little bird gun – legally acquired, lawfully used and stored in pieces in a trunk for the past 30 years – is sufficient reason for three cops to come to my door and snatch it, after threatening me with a search warrant.

Look, I registered the damn thing. I simply neglected to renew. A sin of omission?

Send in the troops.

Fiorito then reported that even days afterward the Toronto police were seen in cars idling in front of his house. What a waste of government resources not to mention an outrage against this man’s God-given rights.

This incident shows the idiocy of government, the penchant for stormtrooper tactics by its police/military arm, and government’s outright inability to consider a citizen as anything other than a dangerous threat. And these facts, the way that an all powerful government that doesn’t have to fear its citizens treats those same citizens, is precisely why America’s Founders enshrined our rights to self protection in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States. The founders weren’t nearly as worried about thieves and marauders as they were of an out of control government.

The founders did not invent this right out of their over-ripe imagination, either. There was an awful lot of precedent for it. A book called Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws (1765) was a huge influence on the founders and this is what it said on arms ownership: “The right of the citizens that I shall at present mention, is that of having arms for their defense.” And ” This is the natural right of resistance and self-preservation when the sanctions of society and laws are found insufficient to restrain violence of oppression” and again “To vindicate these rights when actually violated or attacked, the citizens are entitled … to the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defense.” This warning by Blackstone was born of thousands of years of government abuse of citizens.

With our founder’s heavy use of Blackstone’s Commentaries, it is clear that what the founders had in mind was that self-preservation and defense was a natural right to be protected by the laws and the Constitution. And historically what did people have to fear at least as much as criminals? Government.

James Wilson was one of only 6 founders who signed the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, he was a great Jurist, and was one of the first members of the Supreme Court appointed to that body by George Washington. He spoke on the floor of the Constitutional Convention 168 times and was one of the most active politicians of his day.

Mr. Wilson taught his law students that the rights secured by the Constitution did not create new rights, but simply reaffirmed old ones. He said that our own documents were made, “to aquire a new security for the possession or the recovery of those rights to… which we were previously entitled by the immediate gift or by the unerring law of our all-wise and all-beneficent Creator.” Thomas Jefferson similarly viewed our Constitution and principles, saying: “Government is to declare and enforce only our natural rights and duties and to take none of them from us.” For his part John Adams stated that, “Rights are antecedent to all earthly government; Rights … cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; Rights are derived from the great Legislator of the universe.”

As far as our founders were concerned, the right to protect one’s self was God given. What God bestows let no man tear asunder.

Here are some other quotes about firearms uttered by our founders specifically now that we have the principles of self-preservation established:

• “The right … of bearing arms… is declared to be inherent in the people.” Fisher Ames, one of the framers of the 2nd Amendment in the first congress
• “The great object is that every man be armed … Every one who is able may have a gun. But have we not learned by experience that, necessary as it is to have arms, … it is still far from being the case?” Patrick Henry
• “And what country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” Thomas Jefferson
• “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them” Richard Henry Lee
• “The advantage of being armed is an advantage which the Americans posses over the people of almost every other nation … the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.” James Madison
• “A free people ought … to be armed.” George Washington
  And now, what is the militia? Try these quotes:

• “The militia are the people at large.” Tench Coxe Atty Gen. of Penn. and Asst. Sec of Treasury under Washington
• “Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people.” George Mason
• “The militia is composed of free citizens.” Samuel Adams
• “A militia… are in fact the people themselves.” Richard Henry Lee

And who is this militia? The first federal law passed concerning just who a militia member might be, the Militia Act of 1792, states that the “militia of the United States” consists of every adult male in the country. Under that act each adult male was required by the law to possess a firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition. In fact, the current law still states, “The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 and under 45 years of age.” -United States code, title 10 par., 311(a)

Lastly you can check most of the early states and see that they went even further in delineating that firearms should be owned by individual citizens of the states. But that is another, longer, discussion.

So, what the heck does this all mean? Well, to be blunt, the founders would surely have agreed that American citizens should be expected to defend themselves against the sort of government thugs that pounded on columnist Fiorito’s door. Yes, you read that right. There is no gentle way to put it, no softer way to massage the essential truth that the founders would themselves have been up in arms if some government official had imagined he had the power to confiscate their firearms. In fact, they did. We now call it the Battle of Lexington and Concord, one of the earliest engagements of our Revolutionary War. The colonists, our founders, took up arms to prevent British authorities from confiscating their firearms and gunpowder.

The final conclusion is that no patriotic American citizen should meekly hand over his firearm to the government (unless he’s abdicated his rights by becoming a criminal). Unfortunately, if the anti-American left has its way the United States of America will emulate Canada and become meek, powerless, subjects of an all powerful, uncaring, illicit government.

Don’t let it happen. Be vigilant.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post

Obama Retirement Trap

As noted earlier, it’s only a matter of time until our insatiably greedy socialist rulers seize our retirement accounts. Another ominous warning:

Washington is in a desperate search for more revenue and a solution to the future financing of the trillions in national debt obligations currently held by foreign central banks and investors. Economists, politicians and smart investors know the dollar’s days as the world reserve currency are numbered as is our ability to finance the national debt.

Although the historical government solution to unsustainable government debt loads has always been the destruction of the debts by currency depreciation and eventual hyperinflation, there is always an intermediate step used to buy more time for the politicians in power. This action … is wealth confiscation. …

The largest source of liquid private wealth remaining in the United States [is] the $15 trillion in private retirement funds and the ultimate ownership, control and future of these funds have already been compromised and exchanged for the favorable tax treatment of private retirement plans. Congress writes the laws, so they can tax, penalize, hold your funds hostage and although they’d never use the word, “confiscate” your assets at their discretion.

This confiscation will take the form of compelling participation in a Social Security-style Ponzi scheme that will pay a 3% return (instead of the ~10% you’d make on the stock market in the long term). When you die, Big Government will keep half of what’s left in the account.

Despite the full-throated support this multi-$trillion heist can count on from the statist media, many would resist having their life savings stolen by ignominious blackguards. That’s why governments create crises, which as Rahm Emanuel observes, should never be allowed to go to waste. Likely crises that might precipitate seizure of retirement accounts include:

• Loss of Triple-A Status for U.S. Treasury Bonds

• Terrorist Attack or Military Disaster

• Another Economic Meltdown

All three crises are not only possible under our current leadership, they appear to be policy objectives. How else could you explain Comrade Obama’s pro-terrorist policies, economy-crushing initiatives (Cap & Trade, ObamaCare), and obviously unsustainable spending?

We are heading straight for an iceberg because our rulers are steering for it deliberately. When we hit, one of the first things to go overboard will be private ownership of pension accounts.

On a tip from Funkendunkel. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post

Springtime for Hitler — Stalin and Mao Too

It was only a matter of time before liberals became arrogant enough to stop pretending Hitler was a conservative and proudly claim him as one of their fellow progressive collectivists. The first step is rehabilitation, and who better for the job than unhinged Castro hagiographer Oliver Stone?

Stalin and Mao, communist dictators who killed even more people than Hitler did, are also in for a whitewash. This is less surprising, considering that liberals have never really denied that their ideology is communism set to muzak.

Director Oliver Stone’s upcoming Showtime documentary miniseries “Secret History of America” promises to put mass murderers such as Stalin and Hitler “in context.”

“Stalin, Hitler, Mao, McCarthy — these people have been vilified pretty thoroughly by history,” Stone told reporters at the Television Critics Association’s semi-annual press tour in Pasadena.

Where there is a moonbat with its mouth open, there is moral relativism. Note how Stoned displays the liberal version of “fair and balanced” by lumping an anticommunist in with three socialist butchers who between them killed around 200,000,000 people.

According to liberals, there is no good and bad, only shades of nuance — unless you’re talking about someone they don’t like (e.g., W, Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck). Stone explains:

Stalin has a complete other story. Not to paint him as a hero, but to tell a more factual representation. He fought the German war machine more than any single person. We can’t judge people as only “bad” or “good.” Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and its been used cheaply. … I’ve been able to walk in Stalin’s shoes and Hitler’s shoes to understand their point of view.

But Hitler did have his dark side, to the extent he was secretly in league with corporate America.

We want to move beyond opinions … Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM.

Stoned’s 10-part propagandathon will also have villains: Harry Truman, for example, who was nasty enough to nuke the gentle Japanese Empire. Also, the sinister American military-industrial complex will be castigated once again.

Now for the scary part:

Stone eventually hopes to send “Secret History” to schools as a teaching curriculum.

Already Stoned’s deranged, anti-American ravings aren’t far from what kids are force-fed in school. As George Orwell noted, those who control the present, control the past — and those who control the past control the future.

On a tip from Mega. Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post

Here’s A Deal With Cuba I Endorse

-By Warner Todd Huston

There hasn’t been much news about it in the U.S. but an American citizen has been arrested by Cuban authorities and has been placed in one of Cuba’s most secure facilities.

Cuba has yet to announce what charges they are leveling against the man but he was arrested after he gave out laptop computers, cellphones and other communication equipment to Cuba’s beleaguered citizens. The Cuban government claims these items are against the law for its citizens to own because it “subverts” government authority.

The American was a contractor for Development Alternatives, Inc. a company that has worked for the State Department since 2008 and is part of a Cuban democracy project that has received some $40 million in federal aid.

U.S. officials have been quiet on the matter and have yet to make too many demands of the Cuban government for this man’s release. They aren’t even releasing his name to us.

To recap, Cuban despots are holding one of our citizens, a man that was in Cuba to help people reach the outside world via computers and cellphones.

Now let us go back to June 5 of this year when it was revealed that the government arrested a husband and wife for spying for Cuba. As it happens Walter Kendall Myers worked for the State Department for 30 years and claims to have been a spy since the 1970s. He and his wife were arrested in an FBI sting in a Washington area hotel.

Naturally this traitorous, commie-loving, ingrate was a college professor. Not that anyone should be surprised that one of our colleges might be harboring a traitorous, commie-loving professor, of course. In fact, it just might be as prosaic a reality as one can imagine.

OK, so here’s my deal: Let’s make a trade with ol’ Fidel.

We get back the democracy loving, U.S. contractor being held by the Cuban despots and we give Cuba the two traitorous, aged, cretins.

Good deal, right? I think so, too.

Look at it this way, we get back a man brave enough to risk his life and freedom just so he could foster freedom and democracy in a liberty starved, tyrannical, police-state like Cuba. And Cuba gets two washed up, aging, traitors that are useless to our society yet were in a position to warp the minds of our youth.

Yep, I think that is a good deal. After all, we win with BOTH angles here.

The amusing part is that if this deal works these decrepit old monsters from that American college would be forced to live in the rat hole they spied for all these years. They would finally get a chance to see first hand how bad Cuba really is. They would lose their comfortable lives in the U.S., lose their TV and, lose the culture, books, and Internet sources they’ve spent 70 some decades enjoying. They’d lose all the wonderful products, foodstuffs and healthcare that we Americans enjoy, as well. Everything that a free society affords its citizens would be lost to them as they are forced to take up residence in the armpit of the world, Cuba.

And boy would these Benedict Arnolds deserve it.

Now, since the Obama Administration likes to deal with our enemies so much, I ask of them: please make this deal. It’s a win, win for everyone!

… of course, the only problem with this deal is that Obama likely doesn’t want a democracy loving hero back in this country roaming free and threatening his own tyranny. There’s always a fly in the ointment, isn’t there?

Share on Facebook

Tweet This Post